DISCUSSION WEB / THE USE OF DISCUSSION WEB STRATEGY IN TEACHING (READING) ABILITY AT SMP/SMA

 DISCUSSION WEB

POSSIBLE JUDUL 

1          THE IMPROVING THE STUDENTS (READING)  ABILITY IN NARRATIVE TEXT THROUGH DISCUSSION WEB STRATEGY  AT SMP/SMA

2          THE EFFECT OF DISCUSSION WEB STRATEGY  IN TEACHING (READING)  SKILL ON NARRATIVE TEXT AT SMP/SMA

3          THE USE OF DISCUSSION WEB STRATEGY  IN TEACHING (READING)  ABILITY AT SMP/SMA

4          THE INFLUENCE STUDENTS (READING)  ABILITY BY USING DISCUSSION WEB STRATEGY  IN NARRATIVE TEXT AT THE SMP/SMA

A Discussion Web is a graphic aid for teaching students to look at both sides of an issue before drawing conclusions. It can be either a pre-reading or pre-writing activity, not just as a post-reading strategy. It requires students to work in cooperative learning groups, not alone. (Alvermann, 1991)

A Discussion Web  provides structure by which students engage the text and each other in thoughtful discussion. By looking at both sides of an issue, students engage in critical thinking.

FOR THE STUDENTS

Guided to Independent Practice: Discussion Web

1.      Distribute a selected reading to the class. Be sure to select a controversial text that elicits clearly defined opposing viewpoints. 

2.      Prepare students to read the selection by activating their prior knowledge, introducing new vocabulary, and setting purposes for reading.

3.      After students have read the text lead a class discussion for comprehension purposes. 

4.      Ask the class to identify a key issue statement or main question of the text. Once consensus is reached, post the question for quick reference. 

5.      Pair off students. Provide pairs with the Discussion Web graphic organizer (Appendix D).

6.      Ask the pairs to write down at least 3 reasons for answering the question "YES" and 3 reasons for answering the question "NO" in appropriate boxes. Monitor to clarify procedure. Make sure students have sufficient time to discuss and write down their reasons in the YES and NO boxes. Below is an example of students’ Discussion Web on Jack and the Beanstalk (from Duthie, 1986 as cited in Alvermann, 1991).

7.      After all pairs are done writing down their reasons in the YES and NO columns, pair one set of partners with another set of partners. Give the new group of four students to compare their reasons in the YES and NO columns and arrive at a consensus. Remind students to keep an open mind and to listen carefully to the reasons others give. Also tell students that while they should try to work toward a consensus, it is acceptable for individual members to disagree with the conclusion. There will be time to discuss dissenting views during whole class discussion.

8.      After all groups of four have reached a conclusion, have them select a spokesperson. Then give them approximately 3 minutes to discuss which of all the reasons given best supports the group’s conclusion and why. Have the spokesperson jot down this reason at the bottom of the Discussion Web.

9.      Have the different spokespersons report for their groups as part of the whole-class discussion, including any dissenting viewpoints. Encourage students to participate in the whole-class discussion.

10.  After the whole-class discussion, have students individually write down their response to the Discussion Web issue statement or question. Have students read their answers to the class.

INFO DAN FILE LENGKAPNYA KLIK DI SINI ATAU HUB 085398507498

TERSEDIA JUGA DI CHANNEL YOU TUBE PEJUANG SKRIPSI



Postingan terkait: